2012-01-13 - Re: [GRASE-Hotspot] Wireless Bridge (Was Re: #44: Allow time based “specials”)

Header Data

From: Tim White <ti***8@gmail.com>
Message Hash: 0e7c7ca1270a1899a4ab6de49b8996df335c2b1aca309054e46976f93ae04f92
Message ID: <4F0FF433.1030602@gmail.com>
Reply To: <4F0FCC13.3040209@gmail.com>
UTC Datetime: 2012-01-13 02:06:59 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 19:06:59 +1000

Raw message

On 13/01/12 16:15, Muhammad Zubair Riaz wrote:
> HI,
> AP5ghz1 IP=192.168.200.22, AP-mod (AP-fixed on the top of server room)
> AP5ghz2 IP=192.168.200.21, Client-mod (fixed there in remote place 
> 25KM away) (plugged in switch3)
>
> Bullet2HP IP=192.168.200.11
> Bullet2HP IP=192.168.200.12
> Bullet2HP IP=192.168.200.13
> these 3 aps are in AP mod, (tested with same ssid "INTERNET", with 
> channles 1,6,11) and (tested with different ssid also
> "INTERNET1, INTERNET2,INTERNET3")
> When the AP5ghz-1 is connected to switch2, so the clients get 
> IP=10.1.0.x subnet 255.255.255.0 gw,10.1.0.1, dns 10.1.0.1 but they 
> can not ping 10.1.0.1, While in on the GRASE machine (tail -f 
> /var/log/syslog) also shows when machine is assigning ips to them,
>
>
> I am using
> 192.168.0.xx Using in Linuxserver1
> 192.168.1.xx uplink 1
> 192.168.2.xx uplink 2
> 10.1.0.xx        Grase hotspot Clients Linux
> 192.168.200.xx for Access point (wireless equipments)
>
> Should i changed the IP range for Access points, If yes, so is it not 
> better make changed in Linux machine, because making changes in APs is 
> more hard compare to make change in one Linux box, (what changes linux 
> box will need?).
>
> Thanks
This sounds like a routing problem. Try running traceroute from a client 
to the gateway and see where it goes.

Tim

Thread

Return to January 2012
Return to “Tim White <ti***8@gmail.com>”
Unknown thread root
- 2012-01-13 (Fri, 13 Jan 2012 19:06:59 +1000) - Re: [GRASE-Hotspot] Wireless Bridge (Was Re: #44: Allow time based “specials”) - Tim White <ti***8@gmail.com>