2016-04-30 - Re: [GRASE-Hotspot] Active Directory + captive portal

Header Data

From: Emmanuel Nyachoke <ac***z@gmail.com>
Message Hash: bae59492cf6b11f42f560c6fcde639bb6f3bb2d29844bfe50d440f17c3ef33f9
Message ID: <3c22019f-0ae8-4337-845f-d04b4b92dd29@grasehotspot.org>
Reply To: <a0d40892-f6c1-4dd4-b2f3-acb55d382a88@grasehotspot.org>
UTC Datetime: 2016-04-30 11:36:10 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2016 11:36:10 -0700

Raw message

To my understanding covachill does not really care  where freeradius gets 
its users it cares about if freeradius tells it to drop or allow packets(I 
may be wrong on this). What is the output of radtest.

On Saturday, 30 April 2016 21:08:13 UTC+3, Reza Dadman wrote:
>
> That would b cooool
>>
>>

Thread

• Return to March 2013
• Return to April 2016

• Return to May 2016

• Return to “Emmanuel Nyachoke <ac***z@gmail.com>”
• Return to “José Borges <jo***s@algardata.pt>”
• Return to “Reza Dadman <on***s@gmail.com>”

• Return to ““Gabriel G.S.” <so***c@gmail.com>”

• 2013-03-04 (Tue, 05 Mar 2013 00:47:44 -0500) - [GRASE-Hotspot] Active Directory + captive portal - “Gabriel G.S.” <so***c@gmail.com>
  • 2016-04-30 (Sat, 30 Apr 2016 11:08:13 -0700) - Re: [GRASE-Hotspot] Active Directory + captive portal - Reza Dadman <on***s@gmail.com>
    • 2016-04-30 (Sat, 30 Apr 2016 11:36:10 -0700) - Re: [GRASE-Hotspot] Active Directory + captive portal - Emmanuel Nyachoke <ac***z@gmail.com>
      • 2016-05-17 (Tue, 17 May 2016 01:40:08 -0700) - Re: [GRASE-Hotspot] Active Directory + captive portal - José Borges <jo***s@algardata.pt>