2016-05-17 - Re: [GRASE-Hotspot] Active Directory + captive portal

Header Data

From: José Borges <jo***s@algardata.pt>
Message Hash: 58fd4814ba84c6f74de6898cf373f9ade125f084a6cdb421cc621ead6dcadf63
Message ID: <baf4767d-5e5e-4495-a3b6-cb4e240c892d@grasehotspot.org>
Reply To: <3c22019f-0ae8-4337-845f-d04b4b92dd29@grasehotspot.org>
UTC Datetime: 2016-05-17 01:40:08 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 01:40:08 -0700

Raw message

Agreed! Chilli doesn't handle authentication, freeradius does...

For us to help you, please explain a little better what "the tests did not 
work" means :D

sábado, 30 de Abril de 2016 às 19:36:11 UTC+1, Emmanuel Nyachoke escreveu:
>
> To my understanding covachill does not really care  where freeradius gets 
> its users it cares about if freeradius tells it to drop or allow packets(I 
> may be wrong on this). What is the output of radtest.
>
> On Saturday, 30 April 2016 21:08:13 UTC+3, Reza Dadman wrote:
>>
>> That would b cooool
>>>
>>>

Thread

Return to March 2013
Return to April 2016
Return to May 2016
Return to “Emmanuel Nyachoke <ac***z@gmail.com>”
Return to “José Borges <jo***s@algardata.pt>”
Return to “Reza Dadman <on***s@gmail.com>”
Return to ““Gabriel G.S.” <so***c@gmail.com>”
2013-03-04 (Tue, 05 Mar 2013 00:47:44 -0500) - [GRASE-Hotspot] Active Directory + captive portal - “Gabriel G.S.” <so***c@gmail.com>
- 2016-04-30 (Sat, 30 Apr 2016 11:08:13 -0700) - Re: [GRASE-Hotspot] Active Directory + captive portal - Reza Dadman <on***s@gmail.com>
  - 2016-04-30 (Sat, 30 Apr 2016 11:36:10 -0700) - Re: [GRASE-Hotspot] Active Directory + captive portal - Emmanuel Nyachoke <ac***z@gmail.com>
    - 2016-05-17 (Tue, 17 May 2016 01:40:08 -0700) - Re: [GRASE-Hotspot] Active Directory + captive portal - José Borges <jo***s@algardata.pt>