2015-12-22 - Re: [GRASE-Hotspot] 2500 users

Header Data

From: KIRA Ynet <ki***0@gmail.com>
Message Hash: d39c601f850ccce33065c27fa9e0fea1b9cb16afc06ed384c353155ea5866459
Message ID: <2f1e5aef-dfca-424a-b68f-4328583b619a@grasehotspot.org>
Reply To: <CAESLx0JW5zQe-0GA4iQnpWas1BGP+7Oe_aXo7Y=R1f__ps0tXg@mail.gmail.com>
UTC Datetime: 2015-12-22 19:23:45 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 18:23:45 -0800

Raw message

Hi Tim. 

Thanks for your great idea. 

I've done the testing already. It is the per connection balancing issue. 
when single connection is made, only specific chosen gateway is used, but 
when 2 or more connection is made, it capable to utilize the other gateway 
too. :)
Download won't be an issue since the speed is okay even for single 
connection. and most of time, loading pages and ddl use more connection in 
one time too. 

This is okay for now. My isp won't provide balancing over ADSL conection, 
but i manage to make every user able to use the line. :D
This will be resolve when i got my Fiber connection next year. After have 
the fiber line, i will do testing too. I let you know how is the 
performance afterward. :)

Anyway, thanks for your great work Tim. :)

Best Regards from me.
Jerren

On Monday, 21 December 2015 18:46:42 UTC+8, timwhite88 wrote:
>
> Hi Jerren
>
> Sounds like it might be the multi WAN causing issues. Unless your upstream 
> provider does proper bonding, you'll be limited to 512Kbps per connection 
> (TCP connection) as it'll need to stay on the 1 link for the whole 
> connection. Given that you are sharing the connections, it's possible that 
> the ADSL uplink that is picked for a test isn't actually the ideal one, as 
> it may have other connections already on it.
>
> Something to try, use iperf from a client to the Hotspot, then from the 
> client to the pfSense nodes, then finally from the client to a decent host 
> on the internet. This will give you a good idea of how hard each section 
> can be pushed, and where the bottleneck is. (Try it without rate limiting 
> the client as well).
>
> You may also want to try iperf with some longer connections than the 
> default 10 second test. You may find that with the WiFi part of the 
> connection, the delay in the WiFi is causing TCP to not use the connection 
> at it's optimal due to the delay. Maybe try iperf with UDP as well to see 
> if it's TCP causing the problem.
>
> Tim
>
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 8:00 PM, KIRA Ynet <ki***.@gmail.com <javascript:>
> > wrote:
>
>> Hi Tim. Great to hear from you. :)
>>
>> I have minor issue with upload speed. Most of my customer running on 
>> Rural Development Packages with speed of 4Mbps down, 384Kbps Up. Although, 
>> when it doing speedtest, the downspeed is great. but the upload speed delay 
>> for few second then start pushing up but the speed usually around 100 - 
>> 200Kbps only. The cap is 384Kbps for the client but most of time it doesn't 
>> get to the rate. Sometime, while uploading, it go halfway then hang. This 
>> can be noticed when uploading pictures in Whatapps. My client need to retry 
>> a few time before the images is uploaded.
>>
>> My Master management computer connected directly to the PFSense, so there 
>> was no issue in the upload. 
>>
>> Still, i'm guessing this might be caused by multi-connection internet.
>>
>> as i mentioned, My line using balanced multiple internet source and still 
>> running on ADSL. So, my download is great per connection at 8-10Mbps.  
>> Although each of the line Upload link is limited to 512Kbps only.
>>
>> So, my internet core is balanced;
>>
>> Download : 240-300Mbps
>> Upload     : 15Mbps
>>
>> My my upload speed is the issue when it's on high traffic.
>>
>> *Next year then i have access to Fiber Core as i just manage to deal with 
>> my local Telecom Provider.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Monday, 21 December 2015 17:29:26 UTC+8, timwhite88 wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 2:51 PM, KIRA Ynet <ki***.@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Minor bug i'm still looking around to fix is that the upload response. 
>>>> not sure if this caused by the bonding or what.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Hi Jerren
>>>
>>> Can you please go into more detail about this upload response?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Tim 
>>>
>> -- 
>> This mailing list is for the Grase Hotspot Project 
>> http://grasehotspot.org
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Grase Hotspot" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to gr***.@grasehotspot.org <javascript:>.
>> To post to this group, send email to gr***.@grasehotspot.org 
>> <javascript:>.
>> Visit this group at 
>> https://groups.google.com/a/grasehotspot.org/group/grase-hotspot/.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/a/grasehotspot.org/d/msgid/grase-hotspot/9ffa7bf2-c29a-46a0-bb6d-a1750c05ba95%40grasehotspot.org 
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/grasehotspot.org/d/msgid/grase-hotspot/9ffa7bf2-c29a-46a0-bb6d-a1750c05ba95%40grasehotspot.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>
>

Thread